Gene Literature Dashboard

Viewing November 1979 — 3 paper(s) from the local store. (Local view only — run without --view to fetch new papers.)
← October 1979 December 1979 →
Also flagged:Amikacinaminoglycoside phosphotransferasephosphorylationaminoglycosideamikacin phosphotransferasephosphotransferase
Journal Article 1979-11-01 No Snippets Perlin MH, Lerner SA.
Show Full Abstract

Enzymatic phosphorylation of amikacin has not been reported previously in gram-negative bacteria. We found that extracts of MP1, a mutant of Escherichia coli JR66/W677 that is resistant to amikacin, were able to phosphorylate this aminoglycoside more rapidly than were extracts of the parental strain. Conjugal transfer of resistance from MP1 to a recipient strain was accompanied by acquisition in the transconjugants of amikacin phosphotransferase activity and of a 57-megadalton plasmid present in the donor. Partial purification of the phosphotransferase activity on amikacin-Sepharose 4B yielded an enzyme with a substrate spectrum similar to that of the 3'-neomycin-kanamycin phosphotransferase II found E. coli, except that it was also active against amikacin. A mutant of MP1, MP5, had increased susceptibility to amikacin and reduced phosphotransferase activity. MP9, a mutant MP5, was more resistant to amikacin and had increased phosphotransferase activity. The mutations leading to these alterations of amikacin susceptibility and amikacin phosphotransferase activity were transferable with the same plasmid that was associated with amikacin resistance and phosphotransferase activity in MP1. These studies demonstrate that resistance to amikacin in a laboratory strain of E. coli is due to an aminoglycoside phosphotransferase coded by a transferable plasmid-borne gene.

Also flagged:phorbolmyristateacetatecortisolsteroidbinding
Journal Article 1979-11-01 No Snippets Janssens JP, de Loecker W.
Show Full Abstract

The specificity of the cortisol-receptor protein is examined in plasma and liver cytosol of rats. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate does not inhibit the binding of cortisol to transcortin, nor does it affect the binding capacity of dexamethasone to the intracellular glucocorticoid receptor, but, by interacting with the cortisol molecule, it interferes with hormone-mediated processes in the cell.

Also flagged:concanavalin AI-Cimmune responses
Journal Article 1979-11-01 No Snippets Rich SS, David CS.
Show Full Abstract

The phenotypic expression of I-region determinants on cells producing and responding to MLR suppressor factor (MLR-TsF) was established in these studies. Alloantigen-activated MLR suppressor T cells (MLR-Ts), which produce MLR-TsF bearing gene products of the I-C subregion, were exposed to anti-I subregion sera and complement (C) before in vitro culture for MLR-TsF production. Suppressor activity was prevented by removal of cells bearing I-C determinants, whereas elimination of cells expressing I-A/B determinants had no effect. Interestingly, cytotoxic elimination of cells displaying I-J determinants also prevented MLR-TsF production. Admixture of anti-I-J and I-C antiserum-treated cells for MLR-TsF production failed to reconstitute suppressor activity, indicating that I-C and I-J gene products are expressed on a single population of cells critical to MLR suppression, rather than on distinct interacting subpopulations. Anti-I-C serum activity specific for I-C+ MLR-Ts was removed by adsorption with nylon wool-nonadherent splenic T cells and concanavalin A-activated thymocytes; adsorption with splenic B cells from anti-Thy-1,2 serum and C-treated spleen failed to remove relevant anti-I-C activity. These data suggest that regulatory I-C molecules, like I-J molecules, are preferentially expressed on T lymphocytes. Expression of I-C, or other I-region molecules on responder cell targets of MLR-TsF activity was also investigated. Responder cells were pretreated with anti-I subregion-specific sera in blocking or complement-dependent cytotoxic protocols before addition to MLR with MLR-TsF. Neither blocking nor the cytotoxic removal of cells bearing I-C or other I-region determinants from MLR responder populations interfered with MLR-TsF suppression. Because it has previously been demonstrated that MLR-TsF interacts optimally with activated, I-C syngeneic target cells, blocking and cytotoxic studies with anti-I subregion sera were also performed with responder cells activated by 24 h culture in MLR in the absence of MLR-TsF. Brief MLR-TsF pulse after antiserum treatment generated marked suppression regardless of blocking or absence of cells bearing serologically detected I-region determinants. I-C restricted suppression may thus be mediated not by interaction with I-C-bearing cells, but by target cells which exist in requisite association with populations of I-C+ cells.